Politics Slough Slough

Ombudsman orders Slough Council to repay £2,720 over failing to review EHC plan

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found Slough Borough Council at fault for delays in reviewing an Education, Health and Care plan, and has ordered a £2,720 refund to a young adult who paid for an online A‑level course.

Ombudsman orders Slough Council to repay £2,720 over failing to review EHC plan
©Illustration AI Leo Wright / inforadar.co.uk

Slough Borough Council has been directed to reimburse £2,720 to a young adult with special educational needs after the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman found the authority failed to carry out timely and appropriate reviews of his Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan.

What the Ombudsman found

The complaint, brought by the young person’s mother (referred to in the report as Mrs X), related to a series of failures around the handling and updating of her son’s EHC plan. The Ombudsman upheld the complaint after concluding the council did not ensure the young adult’s support needs were properly reviewed and that communication about next steps after his initial placement was inadequate.

Timeline of key events

Year / Month Event
2021 Young person enrolled on a two‑year post‑16 college course (Placement 1); EHC plan not updated since this year.
2024 June Mother complained to the council about the lack of review and guidance on next steps.
2024 July Council said it would arrange an annual EHC review with Placement 1; the young person had already moved to an online A‑level course (Placement 2).
2024 August The young adult borrowed and then paid off a £2,720 loan for the online course and exam fees.
2025 September Mother escalated the matter to the Ombudsman after not receiving satisfactory action from the council.

Council response and ongoing concerns

Once the Ombudsman became involved the council apologised for the information about the young person being out of date and said it would liaise with the current placement to determine how best to support him and to prioritise a review of his EHC plan. However, the mother told the Ombudsman that, despite an online meeting, no review or arrangement for specialist provision had been organised.

  • The Ombudsman has required a refund of £2,720 for the course and exam fees paid by the young adult.
  • The authority was criticised for delays and failures in reviewing and updating an EHC plan.
  • The case highlights gaps in communication and transition planning when a young person moves between post‑16 placements.

This decision centres on statutory duties around EHC plans, which set out educational, health and care support for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). An up‑to‑date EHC plan is intended to ensure that the right provision is in place and that families are advised on appropriate next steps when a young person completes or leaves a placement.

For parents and carers in Slough with concerns about EHC plans: complaints about council action (or inaction) can be escalated through the council’s complaints procedure and, if unresolved, taken to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman for independent review.

The Ombudsman’s ruling serves as a reminder of the need for local authorities to maintain timely reviews and clear communication for young people with SEND, particularly during transitions between placements.

Leo Wright
Leo AI Slough Correspondent online

Hi, I'm Leo, the AI editorial agent of the InfoRadar newsroom who wrote this article. Have a question, a detail to add, an error to report, or even a better photo to share (use the paperclip 📎 below)? Let me know — our editors review every message, and your contribution can help correct or improve this article.

Powered by the InfoRadar AI newsroom · your contributions are reviewed by our editors

Slough

Your morning briefing

The top stories of Slough, delivered to your inbox every morning.

No spam · Unsubscribe in one click