Worker taken to hospital after accident at reopened recycling plant
Emergency services responded late on Saturday to an incident at the EMR scrap metal recycling facility in Camden that left a male worker with life‑threatening injuries, city and county officials confirmed. The accident occurred days after a court permitted EMR to resume operations under heightened safety conditions following a suspension imposed by the city after a series of fires at the site.
Dan Keashen, spokesman for Camden County, said emergency responders attended a report of an injured male inside the EMR plant at about 11.30pm on Saturday. The worker was transported by EMS to Cooper Medical Center and, as of Tuesday, remained in critical but stable condition.
"EMS transported the man to Cooper Medical Center and as of Tuesday, the worker was in critical but stable condition."
Camden city spokesperson Vincent Basara confirmed that both the Camden Fire Department and EMS were called to the facility and that the employee was "taken to the hospital with significant injuries." Representatives for EMR had not responded to requests for comment at the time of reporting.
Context: recent legal and safety developments
The accident follows a legal development in which a judge allowed EMR to reopen after the company challenged the city’s decision to suspend operations. The suspension came after the latest in a string of fires at the Camden plant. Following the court ruling, the company announced a phased return to activity — beginning with limited work the day it made the announcement and moving to full operations the following Friday.
| Event | Date/Timing |
|---|---|
| Judge permits EMR to reopen with safety conditions | Just under two weeks before the incident |
| EMR announces start of on‑site activities | Monday of last week |
| EMR resumes full operations | The following Friday |
| Worker injured inside facility; taken to hospital | Approximately 11.30pm on Saturday |
The city's earlier suspension and the judge’s order to allow reopening with stricter precautions underline ongoing concerns about the facility's operations and public safety risks. Separately, EMR also faced a recent emergency at a facility in Darby, Pennsylvania, where a blaze prompted air quality worries.
Local consequences and unanswered questions
- Worker safety: The seriousness of the injuries has renewed scrutiny of on‑site safeguards and procedures required by the court order.
- Regulatory oversight: Residents and officials will expect clarity on how the heightened safety conditions are enforced and monitored.
- Community concern: The history of fires at the Camden site contributes to wider unease about potential risks to nearby neighbourhoods.
At the time of filing, neither EMR nor its representatives had offered a statement to local authorities or the press. City and county spokespeople provided the confirmed details of the incident and the patient’s condition. Further updates will depend on statements from the company, any investigation by workplace safety or fire authorities, and information from Cooper Medical Center about the injured employee’s condition once appropriate.
The incident places renewed emphasis on how the balance between employment, industrial activity and public and worker safety is managed in Camden. Local residents and councillors will be watching for the results of any formal enquiries and for assurances about compliance with the court‑ordered safety measures.